"An effective print output environment cannot be based on hardware any more than a building is just bricks, mortar, wood and metal.

These raw materials provide an effective working or living environment only when some architecture and design are applied."

Copyright 2009 Business Communications Group, L.L.C.

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

MPSA – Constructive or Divisive?

As I follow the numerous discussions and postings on various blogs and Linkedin groups I cannot help but wonder if this new organization will promote the MPS market space, or divide the participants.

It is a fact that any organization of two or more human beings is subject to politics; the challenge is to rise above them to serve a useful and maybe even noble purpose to its constituents.

  • Provide a forum for sharing of ideas
  • Facilitate learning for the improvement of the industry
  • Recognize and promote best practices
  • Create standards for the protection of end-user clients
  • Promote fair business practices between manufacturers, vendors and end-user clients
  • Combine resources to promote growth of the entire marketplace

There are many personal and corporate agendas being interjected into these communications. Not only should this be expected but the competition benefits all of us in the end. However, with that said there are several underlying themes which I personally find disturbing and disruptive to the value and growth of this association and the market space in general.

Throughout is an arrogance that there is a higher calling to service-centric sales strategy than a hardware- or supplies-centric one. Many of the folks who appear to be central to this new association are setting themselves on a pedestal above "lesser" industry participants. While I personally believe in the service-centric approach and do not wish to go back in time to selling hardware, I recognize there are a lot of value-laden dealers who do business with great integrity, provide their clients with excellent service and create a large number of very good-paying jobs.

Related though somewhat separate is the theme that the traditional copier dealer and their sales professionals are intrinsically dishonest and stupid! Copier dealers have been providing a high-level of managed print services through facilities management programs for many years. In addition, most offer page acquisition models equal to the print management programs I experience in the field. They provide supplies, fix/repair services, technology refreshment and usage reporting for a fixed cost per page. Let me ask how that is significantly different than the vast majority of so-called print management programs? I must also ask the question "if copier dealers should get into MPS for higher margins then how are they currently gouging their clients?"

Both themes were epitomized by the recent discussion about a relationship between the new MPSA and the BTA. The BTA has transformed over the years to accommodate changes in the market it serves; like Tom Callinan I remember when it was NOMDA and largely populated by calculator and typewriter dealers. Over the years it evolved to play a significant role in building the copier industry and continued to change to adopt the transition to digital technologies and yes, even managed print services. I remember discussions with them to develop managed print services training in 2005 and they have actually been sponsoring training events for the past couple of years. The real point I want to make is not about the value of a relationship or association, but the underlying arrogance and divisiveness that arose in these discussions.

It is my honest opinion (IMHO) that if the MPSA is going to promote the MPS market space then it should embrace all industry participants as potential "converts" rather than the continual piling of some less than civil discourse upon them. I certainly hope this type of posting and discussion is no longer commended and recommended by the association leadership! These individuals and companies can be represented as the iceberg below the water line while the "San Antonio" gathering is that small and visible portion.

Rather than forming an inward-facing print-centric circle holding hands and singing Kum Bah Ya I hope the MPSA turns around and puts their collective hands outward to welcome all of the participants in this industry. This is what will enable this association to reach a "noble" purpose.

4 comments:

  1. Gordon,

    Excellent post and well worth the read. You have really hit several key points right on the mark.

    Yes, the discussion have been HOT and almost uncomfortable at times, since we have so many different diverse groups migrating into the MPS space, I’ll just try to rattle off the different groups and you can correct me on who I’ve missed.
    1. Manufacturers
    2. BTA Copier Dealers
    3. Reman/Compatible Dealers
    4. Parts Suppliers
    5. Comdex IT Solution Providers
    6. IT Distributors (i.e. PrintSolv)
    7. Consumables Distributors
    8. Web ( e-Commence) Vendors
    9. Catalog / Web Vendors
    10. Independent Consultants


    All which also include:
    A. Software MPS Systems Vendors ( e-Automate)
    B. Software MPS Infrastructure Vendors
    (PrintFleet, FMAudit, Print Audit)
    C. Marketing Consultants (Build MPS Business)
    D. Business Development Consultants
    (Business Plans)

    Lastly… Let’s not forget we are all leveraging to reach the: "End-User/Customer"

    So, my belief is it’s going to take a little time to get everyone on the same page (within the MPSA) and to work towards the mutual goals of “profitable sales for everyone”, and a “standardized End-User benefit”.

    As you so expertly put it … The MPSA has to “put their collective hands outward, and give everyone a forum to help this industry grow, and serve our mutual customer base.”
    Lastly, I’d like to recognize Justin West of the MPSA formation team, who is an End-User and keeps drilling into our Head.

    “Remember, it’s all about me as I’m your customer”

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your very timely post, Gordon. I found it both thoughtful and thought-provoking.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for you article. I do know there are reps within companies that do right by their client and it is always refreshing to find them. However the majority of the evals I do on clients, that is not the case. I especially find that the nonprofit sector is taken advantage of and many times pay far more than retail costs. Unreasonable increases in cpi costs and minimum volume requirements far beyond what the client is creating a month are continued sources of abuse. And both of those have effect the overall MPS program.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Based on years in the commercial print industry, I want to underline the importance of an implicit arrogance that puts selling "services" on some kind of higher plane that selling boxes.

    In our part of the industry that has played out as every printer becoming a "market services provider." If you are not a "market service provider" you are just a "printer."

    This kind of talk just buys into the notion that being a printer is a lower function that anyone can do. That's deeply wrong. Commercial printing is a customized manufacturing process that needs attention and focus to manage and get margins.

    It feels like you may be seeing something similar. "The box guys are blablabla. The really cool people are doing MPS."

    My two cents is that once mutual respect for values of both are part of the culture, everyone can stop being distracted by who is "better and smarter" and focus on getting the right solution to the right customer at the right time.

    ReplyDelete

We welcome your comments but will not publish anonymous comments or personal or company attacks. Thank you!